Artifact Resolution
After constructing a dependency graph, Gradle can perform artifact resolution on the resolved graph.
Gradle APIs can be used to influence the process of artifact selection — the mapping of a graph to a set of artifacts.
Gradle can then expose the results of artifact selection as an ArtifactCollection
.
More commonly, the results are exposed as a FileCollection
, which is a flat list of files.
Artifact selection
Artifact selection operates on the dependency graph on a node-by-node basis.
Each node in the graph may expose multiple sets of artifacts, but only one of those sets may be selected.
For example, the runtimeElements
variant of the Java plugins exposes a jar
, classes
, and resources
artifact set.
These three artifact sets represent the same distributable, but in different forms.
For each node (variant) in a graph, Gradle performs attribute matching over each set of artifacts exposed by that node to determine the best artifact set. If no artifact sets match the requested attributes, Gradle will attempt to construct an artifact transform chain to satisfy the request.
For more details on the attribute matching process, see the attribute matching section.
Implicit artifact selection
By default, the attributes used for artifact selection are the same as those used for variant selection during graph resolution.
These attributes are specified by the Configuration#getAttributes()
property.
To perform artifact selection (and implicitly, graph resolution) using these default attributes, use the FileCollection
and ArtifactCollection
APIs.
Files can also be accessed from the configuration’s ResolvedConfiguration , LenientConfiguration , ResolvedArtifact and ResolvedDependency APIs.
However, these APIs are in maintenance mode and are discouraged for use in new development.
These APIs perform artifact selection using the default attributes.
|
Resolving files
To resolve files, we first define a task that accepts a ConfigurableFileCollection
as input:
Kotlin
Groovy
abstract class ResolveFiles extends DefaultTask {
@InputFiles
abstract ConfigurableFileCollection getFiles()
@TaskAction
void print() {
files.each {
println(it.name)
}
}
}
Then, we can wire up a resolvable configuration’s files to the task’s input.
The Configuration
directly implements FileCollection
and can be wired directly.
Alternatively, wiring through Configuration#getIncoming()
is a more explicit approach:
Kotlin
Groovy
tasks.register("resolveConfiguration", ResolveFiles) {
files.from(configurations.runtimeClasspath)
}
tasks.register("resolveIncomingFiles", ResolveFiles) {
files.from(configurations.runtimeClasspath.incoming.files)
}
Running both of these tasks, we can see the output is identical:
> Task :resolveConfiguration junit-platform-commons-1.11.0.jar junit-jupiter-api-5.11.0.jar opentest4j-1.3.0.jar > Task :resolveIncomingFiles junit-platform-commons-1.11.0.jar junit-jupiter-api-5.11.0.jar opentest4j-1.3.0.jar
Resolving artifacts
Instead of consuming the files directly from the implicit artifact selection process, we can consume the artifacts, which contain both the files and the metadata.
This process is slightly more complicated, as in order to maintain Configuration Cache compatibility, we need to split the fields of ResolvedArtifactResult
into two task inputs:
Kotlin
Groovy
class ArtifactDetails {
ComponentArtifactIdentifier id
ResolvedVariantResult variant
ArtifactDetails(ComponentArtifactIdentifier id, ResolvedVariantResult variant) {
this.id = id
this.variant = variant
}
}
abstract class ResolveArtifacts extends DefaultTask {
@Input
abstract ListProperty<ArtifactDetails> getDetails()
@InputFiles
abstract ListProperty<File> getFiles()
void from(Provider<Set<ResolvedArtifactResult>> artifacts) {
details.set(artifacts.map {
it.collect { artifact -> new ArtifactDetails(artifact.id, artifact.variant) }
})
files.set(artifacts.map {
it.collect { artifact -> artifact.file }
})
}
@TaskAction
void print() {
List<ArtifactDetails> allDetails = details.get()
List<File> allFiles = files.get()
assert allDetails.size() == allFiles.size()
for (int i = 0; i < allDetails.size(); i++) {
def details = allDetails.get(i)
def file = allFiles.get(i)
println("${details.variant.displayName}:${file.name}")
}
}
}
This task is initialized similarly to the file resolution task:
Kotlin
Groovy
tasks.register("resolveIncomingArtifacts", ResolveArtifacts) {
from(configurations.runtimeClasspath.incoming.artifacts.resolvedArtifacts)
}
Running this task, we can see that file metadata is included in the output:
org.junit.platform:junit-platform-commons:1.11.0 variant runtimeElements:junit-platform-commons-1.11.0.jar org.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter-api:5.11.0 variant runtimeElements:junit-jupiter-api-5.11.0.jar org.opentest4j:opentest4j:1.3.0 variant runtimeElements:opentest4j-1.3.0.jar
Customizing artifact selection
An ArtifactView
operates on top of the resolved dependency graph (i.e., ResolutionResult
) but allows you to apply different attributes.
When you call a configuration’s getFiles()
, Gradle selects artifacts based on the attributes used during graph resolution.
However, an ArtifactView
is more flexible.
It allows you to resolve artifacts from the graph with custom attributes.
An ArtifactView
allows you to:
-
Query artifacts with different attributes:
-
Suppose the graph resolved a dependency’s
runtime
variant. You can use anArtifactView
to extract artifacts from itsapi
variant instead, even if they weren’t originally part of the resolved graph.
-
-
Extract specific types of artifacts:
-
You can request only the
.jar
files or a specific artifact type (e.g., sources, Javadoc) by specifying an attribute likeartifactType
.
-
-
Avoid side effects:
-
Using an
ArtifactView
allows you to extract artifacts without changing the underlying dependency resolution logic or configuration state.
-
In the following example, a producer project creates a library with the following variants and their attributes:
Next Step: Learn about Artifact Views >>